4 ms·
And what's wrong with magic internet points? I over-simplified the premise. We want to identify interesting and unique content, produced by individuals/publica
by mercurialshark 12y ago
And what's wrong with magic internet points?
I over-simplified the premise. We want to identify interesting and unique content, produced by individuals/publications that may not have any real visibility. This would serve as a win-win for the creator and sharer. Obscure content - that isn't fortunate enough to be on HN or some equivalent - needs a way to be identified and considered for digestion besides popularity. I never said users wouldn't read it before sharing it. While companies could certainly abuse it, that's not the purpose. If I had a smarty-pants blog, but no blog followers, I'd be happy that a deep-learning service classified my theoretical physics blog for consideration/syndication somewhere based on substance of the posts...
- dfc 12y agoI am extremely suspicious of the continued emphasis on "sharing" instead of "consuming."
- mercurialshark 12y agoOk, I'll baby step my logical jump, people would share things they have consumed first... 1. Identify stuff you would not have known about. 2. Much wow - mind imploding 3. Share something that is different and substantive because I happen to hate most shit on social media (not required, but in reality sometimes people share stuff they get excited about) 4. Make the world slightly smarter, expose smartguy's blog to others