"half git-syntax/half package manager-syntax is cumbersome to me." Offer them some suggestions on how to clean up the UI. "Inability to compile Docker from so

"half git-syntax/half package manager-syntax is cumbersome to me." Offer them some suggestions on how to clean up the UI. "Inability to compile Docker from source without using the Docker Project's provided "black box" binary Docker." Addressed in a different comment. "No formal explanation of how to create your own base image from scratch (ie. not using a Docker Project provided base image)." As usual, documentation rarely keeps up pace with the rest of the project despite best intentions. Mind you, despite some holes, their documentation is quite impressive. "Defaults to storing images in the Docker "cloud" repo." This will probably change now that Google is embracing it. "GO Lang is still pretty obscure for most developers, and an interesting choice given the language's youth and likely-hood to change rapidly as it matures." Addressed in a different comment. "Docker is built on-top of existing Linux technologies, mainly LXC, making it more-or-less disposable in the future (as someone else figures out how to abstract/manage LXC better)" This is a benefit of Docker! I'd rather see them build it with existing components wherever they can. "Docker is mainly built by Dotcloud - a for-profit company. Dotcloud has been very generous in their effort... but, being for-profit, what is their take out of it? (It can't be "just for the goodness of Linux")." They're following a tried-and-true pattern for generating revenue off an open source model (giving away the product for free and making money on support and consulting). Companies that try to throw out a crappy product and charge for support quickly find themselves with no customers. Also, now that Google is on-board, you can expect the product to improve significantly as they contribute to the repo even more.