A real test of (Artificial) intelligence would be, must include that it is real capable of learning new things and developing and not trying to convince others

A real test of (Artificial) intelligence would be, must include that it is real capable of learning new things and developing and not trying to convince others that it has learned something (what in this case in my opinion is wrong, since it is just knowledge that is programmed into it -- meaning, not its own knowledge, but borrowed knowledge of the programmers). I would also add, that the real prove must include a topic that the artificial person was not programmed for. (not like a Bayesian filter that "develops" by "learning" new facts about a fixed topic). Learning, developing, evolving, that are the real marks of living and of intelligence (since, I would not part between intelligence and living).