4 ms·
Now if only those "safe" cars were as fuel-efficient as the kei cars, no one would have to pick one vs the other. I feel Tesla is the only trailblazer doing th
by shiven 12y ago
Now if only those "safe" cars were as fuel-efficient as the kei cars, no one would have to pick one vs the other.
I feel Tesla is the only trailblazer doing the right thing in terms of evolving cars further. Granted, they are astronomically priced and hence designed to appeal to the "looks"-concisous buyers who want not just a no-emission vehicle, but also a status symbol of sorts. Eventually, the advances in technology ("fuel" efficiency) and material science (safety) pioneered by Tesla's high-priced cars today, will result in consumer-grade, common-as-mud, family schlepping four wheels, to be accessible to a much larger swath of the population. Then, this discussion will be moot!
- gambiting 12y agoThere are cars which are safe and offer very similar fuel-efficiency. For example - VW Polo with a 1.2TDi Bluemotion engine. One of the safest cars around, and in real-life tests the fuel consumption stays above 80mpg(that's UK gallons). I honestly doubt that those Kei cars can do better than 80mpg. The problem here, I imagine, is price - a new Polo will cost a lot more than a Kei car.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]