3 ms·
#1 is essentially third-degree price discrimination. College tuition is effectively "sliding scale" with wealthiest students pay full sticker price and poor stu
by muzz 12y ago
#1 is essentially third-degree price discrimination. College tuition is effectively "sliding scale" with wealthiest students pay full sticker price and poor students paying little or nothing
- waps 12y agoYou forget that most wealthy people do not have a "direct" income and have the ability to redirect tax obligations. So, like in Europe, most wealthy students have a very strong case that they're really poor : just look at their tax statements, nothing on there. Never mind the BMW. (In Europe anyone who is a kid of a company director or some such who is paid mostly in options or company shares to a "management company" effectively earns nothing. Sometimes their income is a loan with the management company as collateral. This enables them to get a full scholarship financial aid for their kids university education)
- muzz 12y agoYou seem to not know that assets, not just income, are used in the determination
- waps 12y agoAnd hiding assets from trivial privatized checks is hard ?
- muzz 12y agoso that would imply that college is then made affordable to both low income students and wealthy students alike since they can hide their assets. what a bonanza!
- TheCoelacanth 12y agoIt ends up getting paid for by the middle class who aren't as able to hide their income and assets.