4 ms·
This confirms earlier results reported by people trying out the bot: [2008-10-12 08:41:03.468] local sent: I'm feeling well thanks, have you had breakfa
by Udo 12y ago
This confirms earlier results reported by people trying out the bot:
[2008-10-12 08:41:03.468] local sent: I'm feeling well thanks, have you had
breakfast this morning?
[2008-10-12 08:41:11.890] remote sent: Nice to hear that! Do you like the
weather?
...
[2008-10-12 08:42:43.078] local sent: what is your native town
[2008-10-12 08:42:51.593] remote sent: The weather is always as bad as you
think it is. I do believe that the world just a mare reflection of our
thoughts...
It's just context-free, tone-deaf exchanges like that the entire time. I'm having trouble distinguishing this from a run-of-the-mill chat bot. Is the only difference here PR? Or was bad grammar and spelling actually enough to fool someone even though the bot clearly didn't know how to react to simple questions?
- thegeomaster 12y agoSame thoughts here. People were complaining that it's not fair to judge the bot available on the web[1] because it's an older version, but it seems like more or less the same version used in this Loebner contest. I don't know for the most recent one, but I can't imagine it's changed an awful lot. [1]: http://princetonai.com/bot/bot.jsp http://princetonai.com/bot/bot.jsp