Reminds me of http://www.google.com/patents/US20070258329 http://www.google.com/patents/US20070258329 : "Method and apparatus for the exploitation of piezoelect

Reminds me of http://www.google.com/patents/US20070258329 http://www.google.com/patents/US20070258329 : "Method and apparatus for the exploitation of piezoelectric and other effects in carbon-based life forms." Despite the huge prolegomena which would in fact work as a crash course in fringe geometry and pseudoscience, it turns out to be a patent for a golf club (I think.) The point being, how does stuff like this even get past USPTO? Don't they employ people to weed out the nonsense?