4 ms·
> Let’s get this straight: UI-wise, Wikipedia teleports its audience into the year 2004. Yep, and it feels wonderful.
by currysausage 12y ago
> Let’s get this straight: UI-wise, Wikipedia teleports its audience into the year 2004.
Yep, and it feels wonderful.
- the_af 12y agoAgreed. Wikipedia doesn't need a redesign, it's fine as it is. I have some issues with its markup language, but other than that, it's easy to use for reading and editing. Wikipedia: please don't change. I'm not sold on the cult of Newer Is Better.
- sgdesign 12y agoIsn't what you're saying in essence replacing the cult of "Newer Is Better" by the cult of "Newer Is Worse"? You can't know that Wikipedia doesn't need a redesign until you see that redesign. People 7 years ago thought their phones were just fine, until they saw the iPhone.
- the_af 12y agoI admit I'm a bit conservative, technologically speaking. But no, I don't subscribe to the cult of Newer Is Worse either. Mostly, I reject the notion that saying "Wikipedia teleports its audience into the year 2004" is valid criticism of its UI.
- thedrbrian 12y agoAye but the iPhone was more than massive text and only using 50% of the screen