3 ms·
Okay, I'm looking at 6502135... Claim 1 is a joke. How does this not apply to HTTPS? I would toss it and all its dependents. Claim 13 is almost as obvious,
by ScottBurson 12y ago
Okay, I'm looking at 6502135...
Claim 1 is a joke. How does this not apply to HTTPS? I would toss it and all its dependents.
Claim 13 is almost as obvious, but in this case I am not sure about the dependent claims. Some of them sound to me like they might be inventions.
Claim 10 seems stronger to me. Networking is not my field, so I am not at all sure there is not prior art, but at least it seems to contain an actual idea.
I'm not going to read the whole description, but a quick scan seems to support your contention that there is a lot of material here that is not referenced by the claims.
- analog31 12y agoIANAL, but Including material that is not referenced by the claims, gives you the chance to submit amended claims at a later date if your original claims are invalidated.