> it was clear from the beginning that using Wikipedia means reading articles, > The most important use case for Wikipedia is filling the search field and choo

> it was clear from the beginning that using Wikipedia means reading articles, > The most important use case for Wikipedia is filling the search field and choosing the correct search result. See ? That's why your redesign will never _ever_ be even considered by the Wikimedia team: The most important use case for Wikipedia is editing content. Wikipedia has become what it is and lives because every single human can bring its knowledge and share it with other humans. The Wikimedia (and Wikipedia) team isn't involved in editing content: it "merely" hosts the application. It's up to us, the humans from everywhere, to fill Wikipedia with our knowledge, and it's up to you, the UX/UI designers, to make sure we have the best experience while doing it, so it doesn't feel clunky/difficult/unpleasant. If you remove the edit ability, you effectively kill Wikipedia. Please stop this. (At least we agree on one point: there are too many attempts at redesigns, and too little work done on actually important projects[0]) [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor