2 ms·
Except in this case, the ultimate party responsible holds half of the majority voting rights and continues to blissfully push socially inept product ideas. No
by yuhong 12y ago
Except in this case, the ultimate party responsible holds half of the majority voting rights and continues to blissfully push socially inept product ideas.
Not in the case. Vic Gundotra was responsible that did not hold majority voting rights, who managed to convince the Google founders that did have it.
- bane 12y agoIf I'm not mistaken, Vic Gundotra was never the CEO of Google. ergo, he never was ultimately responsible.