Onarbor treats works and reviews the same. Both can be funded and voted on. This is like the HHMI-founded journal, eLife, or several other modern academic journ

Onarbor treats works and reviews the same. Both can be funded and voted on. This is like the HHMI-founded journal, eLife, or several other modern academic journals. Enabling fundable reviews is done to reward high quality reviewing and because we realize not everyone is a creator. Therefore, we wanted to offer more ways to participate in the network. Also, commenting threads are organized by review, which are tied to individual works. Our model for commenting on reviews is Github repositories and issue tracking: Onarbor: https://onarbor.com/review/35/fma-uoboros/chemistry-or-art https://onarbor.com/review/35/fma-uoboros/chemistry-or-art Github: https://github.com/ummjackson/dogeapi-php/pull/11 https://github.com/ummjackson/dogeapi-php/pull/11