3 ms·
Wow. This was almost the exact analogy that prompted me to quit facebook about a year ago. I was watching a show about the addictive nature of junk food, and
by geebee 12y ago
Wow. This was almost the exact analogy that prompted me to quit facebook about a year ago.
I was watching a show about the addictive nature of junk food, and how it works. Many food items, especially zero calorie ones like diet soda, trick your mind into believing it has received something it needs. However, by tricking your mind but denying your body, you come back again for it later (and again, and again). Unfortunately, this applies to high calorie foods that are largely nutritionally empty. You sense a need, you go to the food for that need, and it provides a mental signal that you have received it without actually filling the need.
The recommendation was - every time you find yourself reaching for a salty bag of chips or a diet soda, ask yourself, what is my body actually telling me it wants? While it may seem more expensive, try to fulfill that need as low on the "processed" chain as you can. This way, you'll fulfill the signal and the need.
That was kind of long winded, but I realized, at that moment, how I was using social media. I'm in a state of life, for better and worse, where I have very, very little time (kids, mortgages, work, and so forth). Many relationships are starting to fade, or rot.
My mind was sending me signals that I needed more social interaction, and I was fulfilling these signals with social media rather than real human contact. To me, this is the aspartane of social interactions. You have a need, you use something that satisfies the signal but not the need itself, and so you keep coming back.
Very specifically, I was replacing something that used to be a big part of my life - playing music at jams and with friends, with youtube clips and other videos.
Now, this is a little complicated, in that videos have actually been a good thing in some ways. For instance, because of youtube, I've been able to learn a lot of bluegrass songs well prior to going to a jam, which has certainly enhanced my experience at those jam sessions. And if all I have is 30 minutes after the kids go to bed to learn a new song, well, at least I got to learn a new song.
So I'm not sure total abstinence is a good idea here. There's an interesting continuum of these addictive things. You can quit cigarettes completely, just walk away. You can (and probably should[1]) quit junk food completely, but you can't quit food. And lastly, I'd say you probably shouldn't quit social media completely. But this does make it much more complicated, and you need to be careful about it - and of course, keep in mind that a corporation that seeks to maximize ad revenue from you is something you need to be particularly cautious about.
Personally, I am glad I quit facebook, for all kind of reasons, not just the one above. Occasional fast food is pretty much harmless. I'd also guess that the risks of a once in a blue moon cigar are vanishingly low. The difference here is that you can tolerate some of a bad thing, whereas I'm not sure all social media should be considered a bad thing. But I'd put it in the category of food, there is definitely junk social media that you would want to avoid.
- Dewie 12y agoYou probably have other examples anyway, but I wouldn't consider learning bluegrass songs via youtube videos as a use of social media. > You can (and probably should[1]) Did you forget to add the [1] footnote?
- geebee 12y agoyeah, forgot, sorry bout that.
- incision 12y ago>'You have a need, you use something that satisfies the signal but not the need itself, and so you keep coming back.' Exactly. I'm not sure who coined it, but I've taken to the term 'infosugar' to describe the knowledge analog of this. I don't want to take the analogy too far, but I expect there's a whole range of behavior we easily slip into that evidence this same sort of pattern - bad behaviors as the result of an unfulfilled subconscious desire. For example, I wonder how much the assorted aggressive nastiness you find online is basically a burst valve from sedentary people who really just need to go hit a ball or run hard for an hour?
- Dewie 12y ago> For example, I wonder how much the assorted aggressive nastiness you find online is basically a burst valve from sedentary people who really just need to go hit a ball or run hard for an hour? Physical venting/channelling seems like a very temporary outlet for general misanthropy.
- incision 12y agoI don't follow. It seems to me that anything short of death would be a temporary outlet for 'general misanthropy'.
- Dewie 12y agoI'm saying that people who are really hateful online have issues that are deeper than simply having pent-up aggression/restlessness that can be channelled through some physical activity or sport.