4 ms·
Aw guys, don't go start posting on their site (which I won't link) with devil names. Everyone knows communities turn to shit when they get too big and 300 diff
by na85 12y ago
Aw guys, don't go start posting on their site (which I won't link) with devil names. Everyone knows communities turn to shit when they get too big and 300 different users posting all with blank icons is going to kill the fun for them.
I'm not even a member of Merveilles but that makes me sad for them.
- sounds 12y agoThe icon concept was a fascinating thing to see.
- makoConstruct 12y agoI don't think it's going to be a problem. Before anyone can post anything to merveill.es, they have to figure out how the heck anyone posts anything to merveill.es, which will take some lateral thinking.
- gone35 12y agoWell; for what ostensibly is a secretive, millenial "circle of artists and wizards"; that is an awfully non-cryptographic, weak hash function. Apparently (variants thereof) are commonly used in some JavaScript circles to mimic a popular implementation of Java's String.hashCode() method [1,2,3]. [1] http://werxltd.com/wp/2010/05/13/javascript-implementation-of-javas-string-hashcode-method/ http://werxltd.com/wp/2010/05/13/javascript-implementation-o... [2] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6122571/simple-non-secure-hash-function-for-javascript/8831937#8831937 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6122571/simple-non-secure... [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_hashCode() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_hashCode()
- makoConstruct 12y agoYou expected something more esoteric? I think it's a matter of perspective. Sure, as a crypto challenge, it's weak. But if you think of it as our standard UI for configuring one's user icon...