3 ms·
* Kibana on ElasticSearch. This is huge. You get a polished Search & Graphing UI with very little effort. * Much more approachable config. * Its clustering is
by didip 12y ago
* Kibana on ElasticSearch. This is huge. You get a polished Search & Graphing UI with very little effort.
* Much more approachable config.
* Its clustering is easier to setup.
* Eventhough logstash is a bit heavy for my taste, the whole ELK stack is really nice for aggregating server logs.
- arafalov 12y agoSolr has an ELK equivalent, called SILK. Actually uses most of the same components (Banana=Kibana for Solr, etc): http://www.lucidworks.com/lucidworks-silk/ http://www.lucidworks.com/lucidworks-silk/
- bbq 12y agoAgreed about logstash being too heavy for your app servers. It would be nice to have the functionality in a trim, native binary. As things are, one can always direct an app sever's syslog to a logging fleet running logstash (or elasticsearch running embedded logstash): http://cookbook.logstash.net/recipes/rsyslog-agent/ http://cookbook.logstash.net/recipes/rsyslog-agent/
- tveita 12y agoI think that's what Heka is supposed to be. It looks pretty promising, but I have yet to meet anyone who uses it. https://blog.mozilla.org/services/2013/04/30/introducing-heka/ https://blog.mozilla.org/services/2013/04/30/introducing-hek...
- bbq 12y agoOh, that looks very nice. Neat to embed Lua as a sandboxed plugin environment.
- btgeekboy 12y agoRe: logstash too heavy That's what logstash-forwarder[1] (formerly lumberjack) is for. It's in Go, not Java. [1] https://github.com/elasticsearch/logstash-forwarder https://github.com/elasticsearch/logstash-forwarder
- caw 12y agoI use beaver, which is a python variant of the logstash agent