3 ms·
As long as the service can store my data with a less then 1% chance of loosing it in a given year and allows me to access it at the rate of a few gigabytes per
by JacobEdelman 12y ago
As long as the service can store my data with a less then 1% chance of loosing it in a given year and allows me to access it at the rate of a few gigabytes per month I'd be happy. I'd be storing anywhere from a few gigs to a few terabytes.
- shiftpgdn 12y agoI don't think you're going to get cheaper than Glacier. You could probably colo an atom server with 2x 6TB drives fairly cheaply somewhere but then you'd have to amortize the $8000~ cost of the server over how long you plan to keep it running.
- shiftpgdn 12y agoMeant to write $800, not $8000.