4 ms·
Although I agree with most of your assessment I have to disagree with this: >> They had so much potential when they launched and in the last year or so they ha
by k-mcgrady 12y ago
Although I agree with most of your assessment I have to disagree with this:
>> They had so much potential when they launched and in the last year or so they have just fell behind.
Fallen behind who or what? They are pretty much the YouTube for audio now. If you browse any of the major music sites of even small blogs they embed SoundCloud. When an artist releases an album stream a week before the release and publishes is on Rolling Stone etc. - it's nearly always with a SoundCloud embed.
I agree they really get to fix the product because it's very buggy and missing features that would make the playback experience better (as someone with music on it the artist side of things is quite good) but I don't see anyone coming and overtaking them anytime soon. There aren't really any viable competitors.
- dntrkv 12y agoI meant they have fallen behind features/bug fixes. Poor wording on my part. But yes, I agree. They don't have any real competitors at the moment, so that may be part of the reason they aren't improving their product. Don't get me wrong, I think they have an awesome product, I just thought these UX issues were temporary until they worked out all the bugs in the new site, but it has been a while now. I'm really interested to find out why they pulled Soundflake off the app store though. Anyone know?