4 ms·
>Joda-Time doesn't copy 100% java.util.date but I don't know what the threshold is. I think they're safe, especially given that the process has actually come f
by ddeck 12y ago
>Joda-Time doesn't copy 100% java.util.date but I don't know what the threshold is.
I think they're safe, especially given that the process has actually come full circle now.
The new date time package in Java 8 (java.time) was developed under JSR310, whose spec lead is none other than the developer of Joda-Time, Stephen Colebourne [1]
For those that are interested, he wrote an interesting blog post way back in 2009 on why they chose to develop JSR-310 instead of using Joda as is [2], as well a more recent piece on the bits that didn't make the cut (and are thus now part of a separate project) [3].
[1] https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=310 https://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=310
[2] http://blog.joda.org/2009/11/why-jsr-310-isn-joda-time_4941.html http://blog.joda.org/2009/11/why-jsr-310-isn-joda-time_4941....
[3] http://blog.joda.org/2014/02/new-project-threeten-extra-for-jdk-8.html http://blog.joda.org/2014/02/new-project-threeten-extra-for-...
- hga 12y agoCould Mr. Colebourne have done this work on JSR310 without an IP assignment to Oracle?