3 ms·
Hoefler is going to have a hard time arguing that Frere-Jones was only in the masthead for decorative purposes, it certainly seems to spread the message that Fr
by _delirium 12y ago
Hoefler is going to have a hard time arguing that Frere-Jones was only in the masthead for decorative purposes, it certainly seems to spread the message that Frere-Jones is to be considered a full partner in the venture.
Their webpage as of a few months ago also listed him as a "Principal" [1], which isn't a precisely defined term, but usually implies something like a partner or co-owner.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20131028065322/http://www.typography.com/about/biographies.php https://web.archive.org/web/20131028065322/http://www.typogr...
- jacquesm 12y agoThat might be worth saving somewhere as a pdf or as a notarized screenshot or something to that effect. The archive will remove pages if requested and this could come in very handy during the lawsuit.