"The problem is that dropping a pacemaker 0day is so horrific that most people would readily agree it should be outlawed. But, at the same time, without the thr

"The problem is that dropping a pacemaker 0day is so horrific that most people would readily agree it should be outlawed. But, at the same time, without the threat of 0day, vendors will ignore the problem." If this is the case, then wouldn't the same most-people (if made aware of the issue) also agree that it should be illegal for a company's management to ignore life-threatening software flaws in their products after being notified? I mean illegal as in reckless endangerment or manslaughter, not illegal as in lawsuits and golden parachutes.