Did the negative commenters here even read the article? It acknowledges the success of the Craigslist model and evenhandedly states opinions from Craigslist cri

Did the negative commenters here even read the article? It acknowledges the success of the Craigslist model and evenhandedly states opinions from Craigslist critics and Craigslist insiders. The site's quirkiness makes the author puzzled, not angry. The article is written as an exploration of a mystery, not a Jeremiad. Moreover, it is only part I in a series. From the comments here, I get the impression that many people just read the title. For shame! Hacker News is supposed to have higher standards.