4 ms·
Would that be good or bad, though? I'm still not sure what to make of it. There's the "viable third competitor" argument, but four is more than three...
by jmgrosen 12y ago
Would that be good or bad, though? I'm still not sure what to make of it. There's the "viable third competitor" argument, but four is more than three...
- JoshTriplett 12y agoMore competitors isn't always a good thing. This would solve significant problems for T-Mobile, making them a more viable competitor. I'd love to see T-Mobile become the #1 carrier with corresponding expectations of coverage. The AT&T/T-Mobile deal made sense when it was attempted, if only in terms of network coverage. This deal only makes sense if Sprint and T-Mobile plan to merge their LTE networks, since CMDA and GSM don't overlap.