3 ms·
First, it was 3000 kilometers, not miles. Second, the energy source is the oxidization of Aluminum. It takes specific preparation (e.g. thermite) to release t
by beloch 12y ago
First, it was 3000 kilometers, not miles.
Second, the energy source is the oxidization of Aluminum. It takes specific preparation (e.g. thermite) to release that all at once. The contents of this "battery" are as safe as carrying around a bunch of crumpled up beer cans (very safe) and whatever the heck that solvent is (unknown). The solvent may be toxic, acidic, etc. but hopefully no worse than what's in your car battery, which is actually pretty nasty but not terribly dangerous unless you deliberately try to make it so (e.g. by shorting out the terminals).
Aluminum is currently under $2K/1000kg, so the yearly aluminum battery replacement would probably run a few hundred dollars. Aluminum is the most abundant metal on earth and this reaction is reversible, so costs should stay low. The real cost is likely to be the solvent.
- venomsnake 12y agoThere is a hint here about the solvent http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-09/amazing-rusting-aluminum http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-09/amazing-rustin...
- nardi 12y ago> Aluminum is the most abundant metal on earth Not technically true, since almost all natural aluminum exists in oxide form, not metal. The process of turning Al2O3 into metallic Aluminum is incredibly energy intensive, requiring temperatures of over 1,000 degrees Celsius and some seriously heinous chemicals (HF among them).
- stcredzero 12y agoFirst, it was 3000 kilometers, not miles. Whoops. Still and order of magnitude more than the Tesla Model S batteries.