5 ms·
You should read: http://blog.eladgil.com/2012/10/startups-miracles.html http://blog.eladgil.com/2012/10/startups-miracles.html I think you're shooting for two
by webwright 12y ago
You should read: http://blog.eladgil.com/2012/10/startups-miracles.html http://blog.eladgil.com/2012/10/startups-miracles.html
I think you're shooting for two miracles here - the core idea PLUS the idea that open work is the best way to create a consumer/facing service when all of the evidence seems to point that it's not.
- whit537 12y agoThanks, I read it. > Many people delude themselves on whether they are a one-miracle, or multi-miracle startup. They way to tell is to ask yourself what your product or business end goal is. Is your approach directly focused on achieving that end goal? If not, you may have a multi-miracle plan without realizing it. Gittip's end goal is to enable an economy of gratitude, generosity, and love. So you tell me: is our approach directly focused on achieving that end goal?
- webwright 12y agoNope. If that's your goal (which is a good, but again could use a marketing brain), it's pretty easy to make a list of what needs to exist/happen for that goal to succeed. To me, it's hard to argue that "try a radically different way of developing the product/company" should be ANYWHERE on that list, any more than "run a kickstarter campaign for every new feature" should be on Kickstarter's list or "we should outsource all of our product development" should be on oDesk's list. To me, it looks like adding a ton of unnecessary risk, though it certainly does tell a nice "we're eating our own dogfood" story. But, heck-- I've been wrong plenty before.