4 ms·
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_BSAFE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_BSAFE
by hodgesmr 12y ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_BSAFE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_BSAFE
- vezzy-fnord 12y agoAn older example. One that attracted a lot of attention in the 90s, but was soon forgotten and is now largely a historical curiosity, even though it should have caused people to be aware of the pitfalls of unsupervised intelligence way before Snowden: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip
- danielweber 12y agoWho was forced to use the Clipper chip? As your link points out, all the government could do was try to encourage manufacturers to go along, but even in the crypto wars of the 90's they couldn't make anyone get on board. EDIT Did anyone use the Clipper chip in any shipping product, ever? Note that a positive answer to this still wouldn't answer the question of a company being forced to do it by government order.
- danielweber 12y agoThis is absolutely not the government requiring someone to do something by court order. it was also revealed that NSA had secretly paid RSA Security $10 million to use Dual_EC_DRBG This instance is unsettling -- especially to RSA customers -- but it is very much a different beast from a court or legal order requiring installation of a backdoor.