3 ms·
This article rubbed me the wrong way. The Secret Service is trying to improve their methods in an open, competitive way. Maybe they don't have to perfectly solv
by 3am 12y ago
This article rubbed me the wrong way. The Secret Service is trying to improve their methods in an open, competitive way. Maybe they don't have to perfectly solve sarcasm recognition to reduce their false positive rates.
And let me add that anyone that's stupid enough to try to troll/game this system deserves all the consequences of their actions.
edit: Remembering Bayes: Given a threat on someone the SS is charged w/ protecting, what is the probability it is not actionable?