gee, i wish you could follow the thread, since the petty detail you are squabbling about bears little if any relevance to the main point ;) and yes, it still c

gee, i wish you could follow the thread, since the petty detail you are squabbling about bears little if any relevance to the main point ;) and yes, it still can be a company, unless you wish to narrow the definition of the word company. the way a company will distribute it's profits is mostly it's own business. are you perhaps automatically assuming that all companies are traded on the stock market? in any case, you're the one who started with redefining "charity" in such a wild manner you seem to now hypocritically be accusing me of.