3 ms·
Agree that 3D printers are hard to compare - while reading, I thought of yet another thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned in the article or on the site: spee
by bri3d 12y ago
Agree that 3D printers are hard to compare - while reading, I thought of yet another thing that doesn't seem to be mentioned in the article or on the site: speed.
Besides the obvious size and build area, the main functional difference between my very modified Solidoodle 2 and my friend's Rostock Max seems to be how quickly each can produce a print. The Rostock's delta positioning and lightweight nozzle carriage give it a substantial speed edge, but those qualities aren't reflected in most reviews.
Speed vs. quality is always a tradeoff, though, so to collect this spec in a way that would compare printers you'd need a test print and some sort of specific quality standard. You'd also need to tweak each printer's slice/gcode generation settings, since some printers come with profiles tuned for speed and others for quality.
- kenjinp 12y agoSpeed is difficult, because for many applications you don't want it. Speed means more heat, and more heat means higher chance to fail with step loss or other problems I do think that max print speed could be a good metric to put on the top pages of each 3D printer. I think you're right in that its an important metric that people like to know, even if they don't often crank it up to those speeds.