3 ms·
hm, i would not necessarily call redistributing profits to workers "charity". it is merely an alternative model of work organization, which is actually implemen
by bakhy 12y ago
hm, i would not necessarily call redistributing profits to workers "charity". it is merely an alternative model of work organization, which is actually implemented in some organizations around the world.
- zo1 12y agoThen it's not a company, or they're not employees. Gee, I wish I could just make up random re-definitions of long-established words so I could win arguments.
- bakhy 12y agogee, i wish you could follow the thread, since the petty detail you are squabbling about bears little if any relevance to the main point ;) and yes, it still can be a company, unless you wish to narrow the definition of the word company. the way a company will distribute it's profits is mostly it's own business. are you perhaps automatically assuming that all companies are traded on the stock market? in any case, you're the one who started with redefining "charity" in such a wild manner you seem to now hypocritically be accusing me of.