3 ms·
This idea is being considered: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/presentation/d/1XvZdAF29Fgn19GCjDhHhlsECJAfOR49tpUFWrbtQAwU/preview?sle=true#slide=id.g3840f
by progers7 12y ago
This idea is being considered: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/presentation/d/1XvZdAF29Fgn19GCjDhHhlsECJAfOR49tpUFWrbtQAwU/preview?sle=true#slide=id.g3840fe06e_00 https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/presentation/d/1XvZdAF2...
- Touche 12y agoThat is really awesome.
- mccr8 12y agoFWIW, Firefox has supported something along those lines for a long time, through XPCOM. A little over a year ago, I implemented something slightly more modern for WebIDL in Firefox. Our approach, and I believe the approach described in these slides, is too heavyweight for things like elements that need to be very high performance, but it is useful for a lot of things.