4 ms·
Here is a non-rhetorical answer to your rhetorical question: http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/itila/ http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/itila/ See how far y
by lambdaphage 12y ago
Here is a non-rhetorical answer to your rhetorical question:
http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/itila/ http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/itila/
See how far you'll get without calculus.
- sanxiyn 12y agoYou actually can get pretty far, Huffman coding for example. If throwing a tome is your style, I suggest going through http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/tapl/ http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/tapl/ or http://www.decision-procedures.org/ http://www.decision-procedures.org/ -- you can go through entire books without calculus.
- lambdaphage 12y agoI thought the claim was that you don't need calculus for coding theory, not that there exist branches of advanced mathematics where calculus isn't necessary. So it's germane to produce a book on coding theory and show that the mathematics of the continuum begins literally on page 2.