4 ms·
Bing was actually more accurate than DDG. It provided a local apple store which I know of as the 5th result when DDG just showed the generic untargeted bing re
by sirdogealot 12y ago
Bing was actually more accurate than DDG.
It provided a local apple store which I know of as the 5th result when DDG just showed the generic untargeted bing results.
- foxylad 12y agoInteresting - so you perceive non-anonymised results as better. DDG's main drawcard is anonymity, and Google/Bing are hoping the masses will prefer customised results. So if your perception is common, DDG is in trouble. Or perhaps they can find a way to provide location data in their anonymised searches.
- grn 12y agoMany of my friends, technical and non-technical, do prefer tracking precisely for this reason. They find it more convenient that the search engine knows their preferences, location, etc.
- dredmorbius 12y agoThat's because DDG isn't geocoding you. "apple store" + ZIP or city name should work.
- jpatokal 12y agoYes, that "untargeting" would be the whole point of using "a search engine that doesn’t track you".