3 ms·
The guy who was the maintainer of Google Calculator from 2005 to 2007 confirmed that this is the correct explanation. He said he wanted to switch it to use bign
by jey 17y ago
The guy who was the maintainer of Google Calculator from 2005 to 2007 confirmed that this is the correct explanation. He said he wanted to switch it to use bignums, but wasn't able to (and not due to technical reasons).
ZorbaTHut (http://mandible.net http://mandible.net) said:
it's 80-bit ieee floats internally, but there's some specialized code
to clamp it to zero when it looks like it ought to be zero.
as far as I know it should otherwise behave exactly like 80-bit ieee
(it wouldn't surprise me if the clamping code is being a little overzealous
in this case)
- Asmodeus 17y agoIf the reason wasn't technical, what was the reason? The first thing that springs to my mind is that Google calculator is free, and more precision isn't.