> But that's a very important use case. For Rust. I didn't make the comparison to Rust, I merely was intrigued by the choice of features and in which order to

> But that's a very important use case. For Rust. I didn't make the comparison to Rust, I merely was intrigued by the choice of features and in which order to defend the comparison made by someone else. I see Rust and Swift as targeting entirely different things, at least at first (which means that Swift can certainly evolve inline assembly if it is so needed), and any comparison at this stage is pointless. > It's all over the place in the Linux kernel. Cool, that's one piece of software. I'll save you the next few: drivers and a couple files in a game engine. You're disputing my point how, exactly?