5 ms·
You need to come to grips with the fact that SL was the high-water mark for OS coherency/consistency/quality from Apple. You can't pour all of this time and en
by rsync 12y ago
You need to come to grips with the fact that SL was the high-water mark for OS coherency/consistency/quality from Apple.
You can't pour all of this time and energy into iOS and phones and still make something as clean as SL. Which is too bad.
FWIW, I continue to run SL on an early 2009 Mac Pro with no problems or annoyances ... hope that can continue.
- jitl 12y agoI left the Apple ecosystem when I couldn't move up from my 2006 Macbook Pro and stay with Snow Leopard. Mission Control was such a huge step back for window management in my opinion. I much preferred Expose'ing all my windows across all my spaces, or being able to quickly read content from a covered window while writing an email. The improvements shown today (especially the phone integration and Swift) are making me think about returning.
- unicornporn 12y agoI guess you can, until you run into a piece of software that wont run on SL. SL is my favorite OS X version by far too. But Lightroom 5 requires 10.7, so that's where I'm at now...
- fernandotakai 12y agoi wish i could stay on SL -- spaces was quite awesome, expose worked better, really lightweight and fast. i stayed on SL for as long as I could (aka had to upgrade my computer).