3 ms·
I don't really get the point of this post. OP was an experimental engineer at a huge company, it's perfectly reasonable that he could have worked on whole entir
by dchuk 12y ago
I don't really get the point of this post. OP was an experimental engineer at a huge company, it's perfectly reasonable that he could have worked on whole entire projects that never saw the light of day and that he isn't allowed to show the world because he is not the owner, Apple is because they employed him. He signed a contract agreeing to these things when he chose to work there, I'm not sure what else he expected...
- camillomiller 12y agoHere's the point: it's Fud. WWDC today, so some Apple hating hn users are keeping this up just to counter the broad interest on Apple's news from today.
- billyhoffman 12y agoThat's his point. Sometime you get to work on really a cool technology or project. Unfortunately, if you leave a company, you often can't talk about it (not so bad), and/or are cut off from working on/with those technologies again (for a nerd, super bad). What I got out of the post was to carefully consider this trade off. You may fall in love with something that you can't (for legal, technical, whatever reasons) work on outside of a specific company. "Don't it always seem to go. That you don't know what you've got til it's gone?"
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]