3 ms·
I have now spelled it out for you. "Reliability of 100000000000000 is unacceptable! I need exactly 1000000000000000 of reliability (a factor 10 differnece only
by logicallee 12y ago
I have now spelled it out for you. "Reliability of 100000000000000 is unacceptable! I need exactly 1000000000000000 of reliability (a factor 10 differnece only)." It's hilariously specific. If your error rate is riding up against your usage so that you notice it, you wouldn't expect to just want to cut it by a small factor like that.
- ars 12y ago> It's hilariously specific. The reason for the number is very simple: It actually exists.
- logicallee 12y agoI think it's probably just marketing. They're just engineering reliability targets, a specific batch could have far different rates.