4 ms·
I think one thing a lot of people miss is that vi's key bindings are more ergonomic. You don't ever need to press more than one key with each hand at a time, a
by colin_mccabe 12y ago
I think one thing a lot of people miss is that vi's key bindings are more ergonomic. You don't ever need to press more than one key with each hand at a time, and you don't have to take your fingers from the home row. Meanwhile a lot of emacs key combinations are like playing "twister" with your fingers, and the guy who wrote most of it (RMS) developed a crippling case of RSI.
emacs lisp is much nicer to write extensions in than vimscript, though. It's too bad vim didn't copy that part.
- bdamm 12y agoIndeed, although all this talk of high quality vi plugins for emacs has me considering an emacs review. I've been a vi user for over a decade now and I love it because when I am editing text I feel I am using a truly sharp knife to slice the data apart, and wonderful hand tools to piece it back together. Vim is to me as a woodworker's chest of honed block planes is to such a craftsman. And it is mainly due to the ergonomic design. I can absolutely fly through code in vim without so much as a crick of the wrist.