3 ms·
GP wasn't making a statement about the impartiality of legal processes [1], they were making a statement about the evidence in this case. If you'd like to dispu
by fpgeek 12y ago
GP wasn't making a statement about the impartiality of legal processes [1], they were making a statement about the evidence in this case. If you'd like to dispute that, I'd suggest looking at some of it.
[1] In fact, the comment "somebody has to ring the bell" suggests significant awareness of biases in and limitations of legal processes.
- gress 12y agoThe point is that the selection of defendant is what this is all about. Amazon could equally well be subject to an antitrust case.