This is mean. If a CEO behaves a certain way, it is admissible to put them under the microscope, but for something they have done many years ago, it is extreme

This is mean. If a CEO behaves a certain way, it is admissible to put them under the microscope, but for something they have done many years ago, it is extremely unfair to resurface it unless it supports their current behavior. This is hypocritical. EVERYONE without an exception has things to hide, journalists included. Forget what people have done before, but rather, what they are doing now. Look no further than their browser history. To "cast stones" as if one is innocent is just unfair. As long as someone's views, ideas, actions cause no harm to others, than we should simply not be judging them. I have no idea what kind of person Spiegel is, and frankly IDGAF, but if those emails do not reflect who he is today, why bring it up?