5 ms·
I'm with you up to the last sentence. Agreed that 5m including the house would be enough for level 2, but I don't think it'd reliably afford 20k/month, at leas
by tempestn 12y ago
I'm with you up to the last sentence. Agreed that 5m including the house would be enough for level 2, but I don't think it'd reliably afford 20k/month, at least not if you're talking real dollars (which you'd have to to account for maintaining your lifestyle for the remainder of your life). If we assume a $500k house, 20k/month is 240k/year, which is over 5% of your remaining 4.5M. Even at standard retirement age the rule of thumb is a 4% real withdrawal rate, and many people think that's optimistic in this low interest rate environment. Assuming you're relatively young I wouldn't want to go more than 3% real withdrawal rate, ideally less.
Fortunately, my family's current lifestyle is nowhere near 20k/month! :) My level 2 number is 3M, not including the paid-off house (which unfortunately is rather more than 500k here...), which should afford 90k/year real (before taxes) at 3% withdrawal rate.
- gfodor 12y agoI'm not following. Tax free munis or corporate bonds throw off a 5-6% tax adjusted yield. You can always plow anything you don't spend back into fixed income to make up for inflation. So unless you are expecting massive inflation you'll be good.
- tempestn 12y agoEven a 5-6% tax-adjusted yield (which seems high, but I'm in Canada so I don't follow US rates too closely) is less than 5% after any inflation. Also corporate and municipal bonds are not without risk, although it's not large with proper diversification. Parent implied the 20k/month was spending money. If you're reinvesting some of that money, then you're effectively reducing your withdrawal rate, in which case I agree. Also if you're willing to reduce your spending in the case of a downturn you could withstand a higher withdrawal rate. I'm just saying that a 5%+ real withdrawal rate is not sustainable indefinitely in a vacuum.