7 ms·
I meant that sending logon + password is somewhat pointless if it's plaintext over the internet, while if you have some encryption going on, someone interceptin
by ds9 12y ago
I meant that sending logon + password is somewhat pointless if it's plaintext over the internet, while if you have some encryption going on, someone intercepting the data in transit would have a harder time using it to trick the client or the server. In that sense authentication is more meaningful with a certificate -- even though using a CA still allows interception by a government actor. It narrows the range of those who can "break" the attempted security.
- dvanduzer 12y agoWell, a self-signed certificate still offers that encryption. None of my arguments about X.509 / CAs are about government actors in particular, though. There are enough root CAs trusted by the major browser vendors that breaches can (and have) happened with minimal resource expenditure.