3 ms·
Very good arguments! Twitter certainly has too many mult-level/affiliate marketers and spammers. I've noticed that on Facebook, too, I'm afraid. But on Twitter
by briancray 17y ago
Very good arguments! Twitter certainly has too many mult-level/affiliate marketers and spammers. I've noticed that on Facebook, too, I'm afraid. But on Twitter they can simply start following you. That's probably why they're more noticable. On Facebook connection has to be a two-way agreement.
On the Oprah point: Oprah was a very recent event. Not sure it's had a long enough time to make an impact. And adoption of Twitter has gone up significantly since that spot.
- ryanwaggoner 17y agoNot sure it's had a long enough time to make an impact. And adoption of Twitter has gone up significantly since that spot. Umm... :) Regardless, it's been more than four months since that point, which is around 10% of Twitter's total life.
- apotheon 17y agoAhhh, Internet time -- a hoary old tradition, skewing our perceptions of newness since 1993.
- apotheon 17y agoProfessional tennis players and bicyclists with no interest in the technology themselves pay people to maintain Twitter accounts for them. I think that pretty much fits the definition of "majority adoption".