2 ms·
> Advocates of freedom of speech have said that the ruling paved the way for rich or powerful individuals and criminals to remove information about them, a clai
by magicalist 12y ago
> Advocates of freedom of speech have said that the ruling paved the way for rich or powerful individuals and criminals to remove information about them, a claim that is dismissed by privacy activists since the ECJ allowed Google to apply a public interest test in deciding whether to remove the links.
Oh yeah, no big deal. What would normally be carefully weighed by a judge can just be decided in 30 seconds by a dude with 400 more requests to get through today. I'm sure that's going to go brilliantly.