4 ms·
It's worth mentioning that the bid logo is generally different from the logo of the actual games. London's bid logo was a much more attractive (if less attentio
by hughprime 17y ago
It's worth mentioning that the bid logo is generally different from the logo of the actual games. London's bid logo was a much more attractive (if less attention-grabbing): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:London_2012_Olympic_Games_bid_logo.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:London_2012_Olympic_Games_...
I'm not sure why they change the logos, given that the final logo is almost always less attractive than the bid logo. In Sydney, frinstance, we had a nice neat bid logo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sydney2000bid.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sydney2000bid.png) which for the actual games they decided to unnecessarily complicate with a running man and some boomerangs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sydney_2000_Logo.svg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sydney_2000_Logo.svg
Nothing nearly as bad as London 2012, though.