I actually find the Lacy, etc articles to be the good ones. It's the lesser-known writers churning out several articles a day on the site that are consistently

I actually find the Lacy, etc articles to be the good ones. It's the lesser-known writers churning out several articles a day on the site that are consistently laughably wrong about nearly everything. It's hard not to come to the conclusion that's because they churn out several a day. Lacy's interviews are pretty decent quality, and I like the monthly in-depth interviews with the high-profile tech ceos. I think Pando's obsession with "speaking truth to power" has led them to make some poor choices in desperate attempts to create controversy. It's a seductive path for a journalist, but you've got to learn to do it right, and I don't think they have yet.