In the normal world, "would not take affirmative steps to enable an iPhone to use AT&T’s wireless service to make VoIP calls" would mean stay out of the way and

In the normal world, "would not take affirmative steps to enable an iPhone to use AT&T’s wireless service to make VoIP calls" would mean stay out of the way and be a passive observer. In the iPhone-world however, because of the app review process, I suppose allowing an app onto the Store would count as an "affirmative step". But this also directly flies in the face of "if a third party enables an iPhone to make VoIP calls using AT&T’s wireless service, Apple would have no obligation to take action against that third party." The way I parsed that (what I perceive to be) lawyer-speak is: Apple should not be bundling or giving away VoIP apps for the iPhone, but if someone else does so, whatever. Or does the third-party stipulation only protect Apple from VoIP apps being installed in jailbroken iPhones via Cydia?