5 ms·
I disagree. It's entirely possible to have a good free (as in beer and freedom) full disk encryption tool. In fact, we have several which are in quite wide use
by ultramancool 12y ago
I disagree.
It's entirely possible to have a good free (as in beer and freedom) full disk encryption tool. In fact, we have several which are in quite wide use today. See: dm-crypt, loop-aes, luks, tcplay, encfs, ecryptfs, etc (okay, some of these aren't FDE tools in and of themselves, but parts of a system which can be used for FDE). Anyone who uses FDE on Linux is surely using one or two of these.
It's really just a matter of someone being motivated enough to develop one for Windows. The entire reason for TrueCrypt's popularity over Bitlocker was that it was open source software. All this means is that one developer got sick and tired of it, which is completely understandable, but it can absolutely not be extrapolated to say that all have.
DiskCryptor is currently looking like the next big viable alternative for an open source Windows FDE tool. I'm hoping we see some EFI support though, so I can finally get off BIOS mode.
In my opinion, the best method is to gather a few skilled Windows driver developers to craft a driver based around existing technology, like FreeOTFE, which supports dm-crypt images.
It'll be interesting to see what happens, I certainly think the demand and interest is high enough that we can get some good people on the case. Hopefully some who won't select a ridiculous license.
- eliteraspberrie 12y agoThere is only one free-as-in-beer FDE project that has survived the last decade (loop-AES), out of dozens. The one other survivor (dm-crypt) is backed by serious money (the Linux Foundation). It's safe to assume the odds won't get better in the next decade. That is, unless we support freely-licensed encryption software, financially, rather than just use it.
- ultramancool 12y agoNonsense. ecryptfs has been around almost that long even. And regardless, the maintenance for proprietary FDE products is not much better. Many go in and out of cycle, obsolescence is just a part of software, but there's been 1 or more good encryption options available for a long time.
- eliteraspberrie 12y agoDevelopment of eCryptfs was financed by IBM.
- dustinkirkland 12y agoAnd both current maintainers of eCryptfs work for Canonical.