I'd argue that Bayesian probability is more intuitive to the non-statistically trained. Once people know frequentist statistics, it's more difficult to talk to

I'd argue that Bayesian probability is more intuitive to the non-statistically trained. Once people know frequentist statistics, it's more difficult to talk to them about Bayesian results. I think you're right that the future could be more Bayesian if tomorrow's statistical wizards weren't inculcated into a frequentist mindset.