3 ms·
You don't merely need engineers to design the thing. You also have to actually build what you design, custom manufactured out of exotic materials in small batc
by sparkman55 12y ago
You don't merely need engineers to design the thing. You also have to actually build what you design, custom manufactured out of exotic materials in small batches, and then test those components (often to destruction) before building a slightly-more ambitious prototype. A test or launch also involves a large land area for safety, significant support staff handling hazardous material, and miles of red tape to secure the firing range and airspace.
This build-test-debug loop costs millions and may take months or years, and a single spectacular failure can sink the entire project (e.g. DC-X).
Most engineering is not like software! For example, most of the cost of a bridge is not the civil engineering to design the structure...
- rayiner 12y ago> Most engineering is not like software! Not just that, but original R&D is much more expensive than implementation of proven designs. Not knowing which designs will work, or whether the overall idea will even work at all, greatly increases the number of design/build/test/debug cycles needed to build a product.